You're underestimating the power of his supporters within the White House. McConnell und co are being remarkably silent and probably complicit. It's going to take decades to overturn Trump's policies and tea party stain.

It is completely untrue voter fraud takes place on a significant scale in UK elections thanks to postal voting.
It is also arrant nonsense no one feels the need to investigate it. The Electoral Commission is the independent body created in 2001 as a result of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 that oversees elections in the UK and investigates all voter fraud allegations, report is here.

Summary
In 2019, there was no evidence of large-scale electoral fraud.
There were three convictions and an individual was given a police caution.

In 2018, there was no evidence of large-scale electoral fraud.
There was one conviction, and two suspects accepted police cautions.

In 2017, there was one conviction and eight suspects accepted police cautions.

Quoting a link which has not one single case of US mail-in voter fraud to support your claim that there is widespread US mail-in voter fraud is typical of your chaotic approach.

__________________
It is naive to assume my posts are my own work

Well, maybe they'll all be led out in handcuffs, then.

How is a book on gun control related to statistics on countries around that world that use mail voting?

It's not for the New York Times to decide this (not that what they write can be trusted these days), rather the law courts. If the courts decide there is no widespread voter fraud then so be it.

Read my lips

I'd even dispute the second point. It is so easy to get a postal vote in the UK. There was even someone on these pages saying they'd been voting illegally in UK elections for years.

I'm not sure how organised this sort of thing is, however the system is open to abuse. Just because it hasn't been investigated thoroughly (and I don't believe the electoral commission is fit for purpose to do this) it doesn't mean fraud doesn't take place.

Steve Baker MP has written about this but no one seems to be bothered about changing anything, likely because it suits everyone not to do so.

https://www.politicshome.com/thehous...y-cannot-go-on

https://www.stevebaker.info/2019/11/...ns-in-wycombe/

It appears as if Trump & Co. are seriously planning on staying in power by any means. He won't concede the election and is now firing anyone in the defense department who would stand in his way of usurping Biden's power when the time comes on Jan. 20.

"There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration"

-Mike Pompeo


It's gonna get even more ugly

And we’ll be seeing who supports that ugliness. It feels like a power struggle equivalent to the Middle Ages.

You could not make this shit up! Full banana republic mode

But Courts don't investigate. Surely an appropriate authority is in charge of gathering evidence to be presented to the courts, right?

I think one of the most shocking things that Trump could do right now is to actually admit that he lost the election.

Nearly 80% of Americans say Biden won White House, ignoring Trump's refusal to concede: Reuters/Ipsos poll
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-u...-idINKBN27Q3DW

"Nearly 80% of Americans, including more than half of Republicans, recognize President-elect Joe Biden as the winner of the Nov. 3 election after most media organizations called the race for the Democrat based on his leads in critical battleground states, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll."

Of course not. Courts decide, journalists, etc investigate. However, that‘s the result of their research. And, historically there is simply very little evidence of voter fraud. These cases are simply a distraction and an effort to create confusion. And it‘s appalling.

And yes, they should recount where needed, no question.

Rudy Giuliani

Appropriate, I don't think that covers Rudy.

After the 2016 election Trump couldn't cope with the fact that Clinton got more votes tham him and set up his own commission to investigate voter fraud.

In 2017 the commission disbanded having found NO significant evidence. Yes, even his own enquiry failed to find anything material.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/u...ommission.html

Only if you live there.

I don't recall anyone making such a claim, nor have I seen any evidence that it's easy for a non-resident to illegally get a postal vote. How would you go about it?

If you can't show us how easy it is then your statement is worth nothing.

Through the author. You should Google the guy, it leads you right down the rabbit hole of gun activism, HQC and other alt-right fantasies.

There is no requirement that Trump concede. It’s just a tradition. Just shows that he’s a poor loser.

But he would need to be sworn in again by the Chief Justice, and that is doubtful.

I expect the secret service would simply escort him to the door. Story is that many of them detest him.

Trump now negotiating about his freedom after 20th Jan, that's why he throwing all this sh%t on the fan

, I clicked on that link thinking there is an article....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAq443fhyDo