Because this thread wasn’t full of sexist remarks already right?

Come on. This is my observation when looking at friends and family around. Not saying it couldn't be different, but that's what I see. But of course, sexist.

But not so important that he felt it should remain on the thread and then subsequently deleted it.

Not sure I did.

just that that men and women are different and that each bring different perspectives to a child's upbringing.

Lets discuss what you really think.

Men teaching their sons' aggression. Especially in groups.

Stop twisting my words. And if you want to be a second mother to your kids, be my guest.

Nice toxic Sunday afternoon thread.

actually its a great thread, Ive learned a lot, thanks to all!

I quoted your words verbatim.

What did you mean then? And why did you feel the need to delete them?

Stand by your convictions - like a man? (which is what you would say)

What did I delete?

I couldn't find your post. Found it now. Apologies for that.

Still think it's wrong and misguided. But if that makes me a girl in your mind then so be it.

Who had rule over more countries on the planet than anyone else - A woman (Queen Victoria)

Who tried to take on the might of the Roman empire - A woman (Boudicea)

Shall I go on: The Falklands - Margaret Thatcher, for one.

If I wanted a lesson in egoism I'd get the best person for the job, and it wouldn't necessarily be a man.

But enough to post here about her.

You've heard of her. She hasn't heard of you.

I'd say she's more successful at getting her message across than you are.

To her you are irrelevant.

Birds of a feather …

I've taught my daughters to do such. Their late mother, no way.

Tom

My husband was far better informed and equipped to help our son when he was advised by the doctor to pull the foreskin back several times a day and rub in some cream to reduce the ‘tightness’.
Sure, I could have done it if I had to and the paediatrician who recommended it was female but I think having a penis oneself was helpful in that scenario.

You were the poster who first introduced ‘woke’ into this thread way back on page one but I’m not sure if that’s what he meant.

Thanks, exactly what I meant.

And her message is garbage.

Just some spoilt rich numpty.

Tom

True. But relevant to this thread as far as a discussion goes as the Tate Brothers could be seen as the antithesis of 'wokism' in everything they stand for.

I wondered why Kommolsez chose to comment on something I posted a few days ago unless he was just trolling.

Wokism is a stupid label anyway. I only mentioned it in reply to TC as it seems to be a concept that scares him.

That's a bit of a specific example in the grand scheme of things.