Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Off-Topic > Off-Topic > International affairs/politics  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12.07.2007, 11:07
Lob's Avatar
Lob Lob is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,814
Groaned at 45 Times in 40 Posts
Thanked 1,973 Times in 1,060 Posts
Lob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond repute
[UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Read about it here....

Quote:
It would mean the cost of some of Britain's favourite foods like pizza, chips and chocolate, going up in price.
Now tell me I'm way-off here but I predict that, if this "tax" came into existence, people would still buy junk food and I would expect the poorer folk near the breadline to be a significant consumer of such goods.

They would not change their habits and therefore the poor would become poorer and no more healthy.

Does anyone agree? Does anyone see fewer people smoking because duty on cigarettes was increased (for example)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12.07.2007, 11:09
Polorise's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: about there
Posts: 2,738
Groaned at 26 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 2,325 Times in 1,259 Posts
Polorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
Read about it here....



Now tell me I'm way-off here but I predict that, if this "tax" came into existence, people would still buy junk food and I would expect the poorer folk near the breadline to be a significant consumer of such goods.

They would not change their habits and therefore the poor would become poorer and no more healthy.

Does anyone agree? Does anyone see fewer people smoking because duty on cigarettes was increased (for example)?
Good news for Aldi ......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12.07.2007, 11:49
Blonaybear's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Blonay
Posts: 1,597
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 836 Times in 432 Posts
Blonaybear has a reputation beyond reputeBlonaybear has a reputation beyond reputeBlonaybear has a reputation beyond reputeBlonaybear has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
Read about it here....



Now tell me I'm way-off here but I predict that, if this "tax" came into existence, people would still buy junk food and I would expect the poorer folk near the breadline to be a significant consumer of such goods.

They would not change their habits and therefore the poor would become poorer and no more healthy.

Does anyone agree? Does anyone see fewer people smoking because duty on cigarettes was increased (for example)?
I Agree.

UK politicians seem to beleive that they can control every aspect of lift by one simple measure, if they think it’s bad for you then TAX it. If they really want to improve public health how about starting with clean hospitals ?

Just waiting for them to realise that the UK population is going to get too big for the island and they must stop making babies. The No Nookie tax is probably being planned right now !
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12.07.2007, 11:51
cyrus's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Emmenbruecke
Posts: 2,896
Groaned at 37 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 3,373 Times in 1,477 Posts
cyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
Read about it here....



Now tell me I'm way-off here but I predict that, if this "tax" came into existence, people would still buy junk food and I would expect the poorer folk near the breadline to be a significant consumer of such goods.

They would not change their habits and therefore the poor would become poorer and no more healthy.

Does anyone agree? Does anyone see fewer people smoking because duty on cigarettes was increased (for example)?
Maybe it'll create a black market for junk food, just like tobacco.

Shady geezers in pubs selling big macs from france. "Here mate, wanna buy a "Royale"?".
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12.07.2007, 11:51
Polorise's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: about there
Posts: 2,738
Groaned at 26 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 2,325 Times in 1,259 Posts
Polorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond reputePolorise has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
I Agree.

UK politicians seem to beleive that they can control every aspect of lift by one simple measure, if they think it’s bad for you then TAX it. If they really want to improve public health how about starting with clean hospitals ?

Just waiting for them to realise that the UK population is going to get too big for the island and they must stop making babies. The No Nookie tax is probably being planned right now !
it's getting worse .... they now instigated a Ministry of Justice ffs !!!!
Judge Dredd anyone ....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:05
PlantHead's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,693
Groaned at 65 Times in 49 Posts
Thanked 2,702 Times in 1,015 Posts
PlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

What about the argument though that if you eat rubbish junk food you are more likely to be ill, therefore costing the state more in medical care....so tax the fat bloaters at source to pay for the medical care they will eventually need.

I reckon that's their real thinking, and they just dress it up by saying it will help people be healthier.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:18
gbn's Avatar
gbn gbn is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Zuri Oberland
Posts: 2,727
Groaned at 109 Times in 74 Posts
Thanked 2,353 Times in 1,105 Posts
gbn has a reputation beyond reputegbn has a reputation beyond reputegbn has a reputation beyond reputegbn has a reputation beyond reputegbn has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
What about the argument though that if you eat rubbish junk food you are more likely to be ill, therefore costing the state more in medical care....so tax the fat bloaters at source to pay for the medical care they will eventually need.

I reckon that's their real thinking, and they just dress it up by saying it will help people be healthier.
Extreme sporters... smokers... drinkers... car accident victims.. old people...
Just where do you draw the line?

Pick one: Old people occupy a huge number of NHS beds and cost a lot of money. Euthanase the lot of 'em?

And the state does not pay.
The state has no money per se, it is funded by taxation

And finally, shall we tax those people who don't appear for appointments?
How much time therefore money is wasted on no-shows
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:20
Lob's Avatar
Lob Lob is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,814
Groaned at 45 Times in 40 Posts
Thanked 1,973 Times in 1,060 Posts
Lob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Indeed; anyone been to A&E on a Saturday afternoon and seen the number of sports injuries?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:24
Uncle Max's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Züri
Posts: 7,582
Groaned at 171 Times in 111 Posts
Thanked 8,424 Times in 3,486 Posts
Uncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
What about the argument though that if you eat rubbish junk food you are more likely to be ill, therefore costing the state more in medical care....so tax the fat bloaters at source to pay for the medical care they will eventually need.

I reckon that's their real thinking, and they just dress it up by saying it will help people be healthier.
Is there anything intrinsically wrong with this approach? If 3000 people less die each year, for the sake of 67p extra There are a lot of obese people who are malnourished. Crap in = Crap out. You're free to eat crap, just don't expect the Welfare State to carry the cost if you're irresponsible. However I doubt the taxes would be used directly for obesity prevention...

(Anyone coming to play footie on Sunday? Come on, Lardy )
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:27
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 806
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 659 Times in 273 Posts
HeatherM has a reputation beyond reputeHeatherM has a reputation beyond reputeHeatherM has a reputation beyond reputeHeatherM has a reputation beyond reputeHeatherM has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
Does anyone see fewer people smoking because duty on cigarettes was increased (for example)?
A good friend of mine did her PhD in studying the efficacy of various anti-smoking tactics (implementing bans in public places, raising prices, restricting advertising, printing warnings on packages, etc.) and she said that there is a definite correlation between increased tobacco taxes and a reduction in smoking rate. It's true that many people will choose to continue to smoke, but for some people the increased cost of smoking does provide the final impetus for them to quit. So implementing this type of policy to reduce the smoking rate is based on fact, and not just opinion.

Quote:
Just waiting for them to realise that the UK population is going to get too big for the island and they must stop making babies. The No Nookie tax is probably being planned right now !
Seen this?

HeatherM
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:32
Lob's Avatar
Lob Lob is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,814
Groaned at 45 Times in 40 Posts
Thanked 1,973 Times in 1,060 Posts
Lob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond reputeLob has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
A good friend of mine did her PhD in studying the efficacy of various anti-smoking tactics (implementing bans in public places, raising prices, restricting advertising, printing warnings on packages, etc.) and she said that there is a definite correlation between increased tobacco taxes and a reduction in smoking rate. It's true that many people will choose to continue to smoke, but for some people the increased cost of smoking does provide the final impetus for them to quit. So implementing this type of policy to reduce the smoking rate is based on fact, and not just opinion.
I can imagine that there are some who quit based on price but compared to non-addictive consumer items, the price increase must be significant.

Sounds like an interesting thesis though.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:38
AbFab's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Zürich
Posts: 7,496
Groaned at 316 Times in 212 Posts
Thanked 10,020 Times in 3,533 Posts
AbFab has a reputation beyond reputeAbFab has a reputation beyond reputeAbFab has a reputation beyond reputeAbFab has a reputation beyond reputeAbFab has a reputation beyond reputeAbFab has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

'Poor' people eat junk food because it's cheap. Make it more expensive and they might eat fruit otherwise "let them eat cake".

You can't have a nanny state without nanny poking her nose in now and again...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:47
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Luzern currently
Posts: 2,565
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 720 Times in 373 Posts
Richard has a reputation beyond reputeRichard has a reputation beyond reputeRichard has a reputation beyond reputeRichard has a reputation beyond reputeRichard has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
So implementing this type of policy to reduce the smoking rate is based on fact, and not just opinion.
No, no, no... A thesis is rarely fact. It is a reasoned opinion or view on a subject submitted for academic review. Only when it is able to be proved is it fact. And why people give up smoking is a complex web of factors and not a single key point. Those who yearn to be famous and wealthy in a world where only the wealthy can smoke would find smoking more attractive...

I would argue that the key, the killer criteria is social acceptability. If it is not socially acceptable fewer will do it. Then would come legislation prohibiting it and then price. But I did not write a PHD on the subject and therefore have no idea. Just I cannot see a great difference between smoking and drinking wrt to this point and the order I have quoted is the generally accepted viewpoint on alcohol...
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Richard for this useful post:
  #14  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:48
cyrus's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Emmenbruecke
Posts: 2,896
Groaned at 37 Times in 34 Posts
Thanked 3,373 Times in 1,477 Posts
cyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond reputecyrus has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
'Poor' people eat junk food because it's cheap. Make it more expensive and they might eat fruit otherwise "let them eat cake".

You can't have a nanny state without nanny poking her nose in now and again...

I'm not sure that's really true, even given cheaper alternatives, people still want their crap.

I'll always remember the image of the mums dealing fish and chips through the school fence because the school decided to stop selling junk food.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:52
Uncle Max's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Züri
Posts: 7,582
Groaned at 171 Times in 111 Posts
Thanked 8,424 Times in 3,486 Posts
Uncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

It might be an idea to introduce cookery classes in schools, as mentioned in todays UK news. I have plenty of friends who don't have a clue about ingredients, nutrition, RDA% etc. And they're not dumb people, it's just still not part of the culture, no matter how many cookery shows we have. Have you seen the number of junk food adverts there are on UK TV?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:53
PlantHead's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 1,693
Groaned at 65 Times in 49 Posts
Thanked 2,702 Times in 1,015 Posts
PlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond reputePlantHead has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
I'm not sure that's really true, even given cheaper alternatives, people still want their crap.

I'll always remember the image of the mums dealing fish and chips through the school fence because the school decided to stop selling junk food.
Thats the Jamie Oliver school dinners thing huh?

Quote:
Just I cannot see a great difference between smoking and drinking wrt to this point and the order I have quoted is the generally acceptedviewpoint on alcohol...
And smoking and fast food are different from alcohol surely, in that drinking some alcohol is better for you than drinking no alcohol.

Last edited by PlantHead; 12.07.2007 at 12:55. Reason: to add richard quote
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12.07.2007, 12:54
Uncle Max's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Züri
Posts: 7,582
Groaned at 171 Times in 111 Posts
Thanked 8,424 Times in 3,486 Posts
Uncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond reputeUncle Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
Thats the Jamie Oliver school dinners thing huh?

And smoking and fast food are different from alcohol surely, in that drinking some alcohol is better for you than drinking no alcohol.
It's a cold heart which never rejoices...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12.07.2007, 13:03
WorldTraveller's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Aarau
Posts: 511
Groaned at 9 Times in 8 Posts
Thanked 151 Times in 101 Posts
WorldTraveller has earned some respectWorldTraveller has earned some respect
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Not another tax! The department needed to determine who pays that tax alone is going to cost the tax payer more than the tax collected! It's not as if obese people don't know that being fat is bad for their health. You can be sure that this tax will eventually mutate into another stealth tax!

Last edited by WorldTraveller; 12.07.2007 at 13:06. Reason: run on sentence
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12.07.2007, 13:15
Cata1yst
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
A good friend of mine did her PhD in studying the efficacy of various anti-smoking tactics (implementing bans in public places, raising prices, restricting advertising, printing warnings on packages, etc.) and she said that there is a definite correlation between increased tobacco taxes and a reduction in smoking rate. It's true that many people will choose to continue to smoke, but for some people the increased cost of smoking does provide the final impetus for them to quit. So implementing this type of policy to reduce the smoking rate is based on fact, and not just opinion.

Seen this?

HeatherM
This the same people who rejoiced over the large drop in the number of smokers in Ireland after a ban came in, only to find 3 months later it was virtually back to normal?

Have you been a smoker?? If not don't feel free to speak for us that choose to smoke!

Someone's already said it, but these comments are unproven.

You can't force anyone to stop anything legal, taxation works to an extent, but it will never stop people from smoking/drinking or eating crap food.

Ask the UK govt cigarettes are probably the most expensive in Europe, but people are still smoking!

The best bet to make smoking unacceptable in society is to raise the age to 21, cutting off the kids picking it up each year, perhaps raising the bar by 1 year each year. With free access for smokers to giving up smoking tools. Tutting, jumping up and down or banning it from bars will not stop everyone from smoking.

You also have to accept some people do not want to give up.

A good idea would be to offer subsidies on fruit/veg etc. The other problem with "fat foods" is they tend to come with masses of packaging which is bad for the environment.

Years ago people would cook food in the UK, now it seems most sit in front of the TV eating nuked curries and take outs?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12.07.2007, 13:18
Cata1yst
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [UK news] Proposed "Fat tax"

Quote:
View Post
Extreme sporters... smokers... drinkers... car accident victims.. old people...
Just where do you draw the line?

Pick one: Old people occupy a huge number of NHS beds and cost a lot of money. Euthanase the lot of 'em?

And the state does not pay.
The state has no money per se, it is funded by taxation

And finally, shall we tax those people who don't appear for appointments?
How much time therefore money is wasted on no-shows
Well I did warn you guys in another thread about smoking. These people are going too far!
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does "Anteilscheine" mean "deposit"? bozothedeathmachine Housing in general 20 13.03.2015 13:02
Baschi!!! [apparently some Swiss pop "star" has been "spotted"] Gina Daily life 28 22.06.2010 16:27
Definitive Tax Statement - "Verrechnung Haben" gbn Finance/banking/taxation 9 12.07.2007 16:55
"L" vs. "B" work permit van_niel Permits/visas/government 8 11.03.2007 13:14


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0