Seriously. I didn't say 'washed away' but spat. As simple as that.
You are right. Not clear. So is it a power, or the principle, we are talking about now?

Not sure she meant it as a joke, even though she publicly may have portrayed it as a joke. Speaking of the principle, again.

Sure - why not add Colombia to the mix as well? After all they have some nice products and the population very fond of the US. Unlike Venezuela - oh yes, they have the oil so why not take them as well?

Same like the previous comment to expand the Court membership. Why nine? Why not 99? or 999? or... the sky is the limit!

Just read another the Guardian's piece - speaking of power vs principle. And guess what - the article is all about the principle, save for her comment on her principled last wish...

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...l-donald-trump

Even if Trump were to lose, he will still be president for a further 2 1/2 months.

Reality, people. Try it sometime.

Tom

It was a joke made by RGB. It would be absurd, same way as it was with nine justices all males.

are Colombia or Venezuela unincorporated territories of the U.S??

Are they not?

Surely you're joking...

One would hope so.

they are not. your comment is a non sequitur

Trump should get 4 more years, ram in many more conservative judges, divide the country a little more, break democratic norms at will.
It will give the US a taste of the medicine it has dished out ( in many cases forced ) across the world.

When you put it that way, hard to disagree. That is what’s happening. Of course we all mourn the losses our loved ones there will endure. It’s not completely their fault. Collateral damage they are.

99% of humanity is collateral damage thanks to the rapacious greed of the alpha males of our species.

Probably depends whether you believe in borders or not.

Or forced hysterectomies.

perhaps this better be asked to the deep states and co. - believing in borders when it suits them.

Yes, ask the deep state. Let me know when you find them. I’d start with the same hangouts as big foot, the lochness monster and unicorns.

Also antifa.....don’t forget about them.

am not the one asking here anything, nor looking for anyone.

Of course not. Just regurgitating dangerous, outlandish claims.

Yes, but it's been a long-held tradition in the US that a new Justice is not appointed until after a presidential election, when the Justice that is being replaced had passed away very close to the election.

And in 2016, Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell (a Republican) had blocked President Barack Obama’s nomination of a new Justice on the grounds that it was an election year. And it was only March at the time, so there were still many months to go before the actual election in November; whereas right now, we're literally just weeks away.

It's called a double standard. Democrats should know all about them.