Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Swiss politics/news  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:07
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
Nature hardwires humans against the act.
If that was the case, then it wouldn't exist, would it?
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:08
NSchulzi's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Zug
Posts: 2,422
Groaned at 52 Times in 33 Posts
Thanked 2,523 Times in 1,215 Posts
NSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
On what grounds?

And what right has government to dictate sexual morals where consenting adults are involved?
Nature itself implemented a means whereby siblings are not sexually attracted to each other, for good reason I think. It is called the Westermarck effect, but it unfortunately diminishes in power after the age of about six.

Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:08
Gastro Gnome's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Zürich
Posts: 3,553
Groaned at 49 Times in 35 Posts
Thanked 2,856 Times in 1,550 Posts
Gastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
...unnatural. Acted against by nature in humans. Nature hardwires humans against the act. If you aren't against it, check your wiring.
And are you SO certain of what's 'natural' and what isn't?

I suppose that contact lenses, antibiotics, contraception, fertility treatment and all kinds of other medical interventions are problematic for you too.
Reply With Quote
This user groans at Gastro Gnome for this post:
  #104  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:09
Upthehatters2008's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the kitchen at parties.
Posts: 4,540
Groaned at 204 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 6,078 Times in 2,378 Posts
Upthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
The purpose of repealing the law is so that consenting adults aren't prosecuted for something which does absolutely no harm to anyone else.

By the way, if you're main aim here is to prevent the production of 'defective' offspring, are there other groups you'd like to target, perhaps with sterilization or gene therapy? The urge to do away with those with genetic illnesses would seem more at home in the 1930s when eugenics was popular.

Your style of discussion this evening doesn't seem particularly level.
Not level ,from the weird angle you are coming in at. Dragging the thread off into eugenics and gene therapy is moving too far away from the subject. You have no case to argue, Nature has made it's purpose clear, and designed us to avoid incest. There is nothing to be gained from incest, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:10
Upthehatters2008's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the kitchen at parties.
Posts: 4,540
Groaned at 204 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 6,078 Times in 2,378 Posts
Upthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
And are you SO certain of what's 'natural' and what isn't?

I suppose that contact lenses, antibiotics, contraception, fertility treatment and all kinds of other medical interventions are problematic for you too.
Not at all...
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
Nature itself implemented a means whereby siblings are not sexually attracted to each other, for good reason I think.
Well, if that's the case, then there's no need for a law, is there?
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:10
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: OOO
Posts: 3,724
Groaned at 79 Times in 55 Posts
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,017 Posts
Sada has a reputation beyond reputeSada has a reputation beyond reputeSada has a reputation beyond reputeSada has a reputation beyond reputeSada has a reputation beyond reputeSada has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
On what grounds?

And what right has government to dictate sexual morals where consenting adults are involved?
Do you mean I can have sex with another adult on the bus in broad daylight and not get into trouble with the law?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:11
NSchulzi's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Zug
Posts: 2,422
Groaned at 52 Times in 33 Posts
Thanked 2,523 Times in 1,215 Posts
NSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
Morally ill-conceived on what basis? Where are you getting your morality from and why should others be subject to it?
Why not? I am entitled to my own opinion and this is a discussion forum.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users groan at NSchulzi for this post:
  #109  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:11
economisto
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
How about the children? They or society are the ones that will have to deal with their disabilities and deformities that may result from this and even if all is okay genetically, there is still the stigma associated with this.
Aha! This is exactly the same field of play as the pro-right-to-abortion argument, and one that I was brought round to by certain forumers here. It isn't illegal for a pregnant mother to pound vodka, because law makers are understandable reticent about making laws that affect what we're allowed to do with our own bodies, irrespective of harming an unborn child. This is the same with incest - if a mother is allowed to harm her foetus with smoking and drinking then the same must logically be true of engaging in incest.

Quote:
View Post
No, Odile said "I don't understand incest, just like I don't understand being gay but I try to be tolerant...". That means that to him/her homosexuality and incest is on the same level which isn't at all since one cannot chose to be homosexual but one can surely chose to be involved in incest (at least in Western culture one can chose).
Incest is on the same level as homosexuality. As well as hetrosexuality. They're just sexual preferences. I wouldn't say any can be helped (though actually engaging in intercourse can be resisted by all three groups). Incest creates disabled children, homosexual sex creates no children and hetrosexual sex creates too many children. Again, I don't see the basic ethical distinction.

What they share in the realm of sexual preferences is that they exclusively involve consenting adults, unlike paedophilia and bestiality.

Quote:
View Post
That's why there are laws against incest. To declare that these things are unimportant in the face of the important issues facing the Swiss government is crass. Wake the f**k up!
So what you're saying is, there are laws against incest because there are laws against incest?

Quote:
View Post
Human laws are irrelevant here, The laws of nature, and genetics take precedent. Incestuous people are like GM scientists, in it for greed and lust and to he'll with the consequences. It has been wrong since the beginning, outcast since the beginning and no amount of liberal thinking will produce a strong enough case that will change how nature makes us think about these acts. Pro-incest arguments reveal just a little too much about the prescribed.
There are no laws of genetics. There are views. You, as I, am unable to predict the future logical progression of one decision or another on genetics. Incest causes mutation, but mutation is the only reason we don't still live in the sea. And there are other issues to consider beyond genetics - if there weren't we just let the top 1% breed. And then some of the people on this thread would be sh!t outta luck.
Reply With Quote
The following 5 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #110  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:12
Upthehatters2008's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: In the kitchen at parties.
Posts: 4,540
Groaned at 204 Times in 120 Posts
Thanked 6,078 Times in 2,378 Posts
Upthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond reputeUpthehatters2008 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
If that was the case, then it wouldn't exist, would it?
But it does, as with any other aberration... It fails to be part of natural selection , fails to offer anything to the species and will always be a freak act.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:12
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
There is nothing to be gained from incest, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.
Now... where have I heard this argument before...?

Oh yes...

There is nothing to be gained from felatio, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

There is nothing to be gained from anal sex, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

There is nothing to be gained from cunnilingus, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

There is nothing to be gained from homosexuality, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

Describing sexual acts between consenting adults as "selfish, shallow acts of abuse" is a slippery road to go down.

Quote:
View Post
But it does, as with any other aberration... It fails to be part of natural selection , fails to offer anything to the species and will always be a freak act.
So is sex on the pill, amongst other things. Are you quite so hysterical in your condemnation of that?
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #112  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:13
MathNut's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kt. Glarus
Posts: 4,415
Groaned at 34 Times in 32 Posts
Thanked 10,952 Times in 3,253 Posts
MathNut has a reputation beyond reputeMathNut has a reputation beyond reputeMathNut has a reputation beyond reputeMathNut has a reputation beyond reputeMathNut has a reputation beyond reputeMathNut has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
So, does that imply that you are pro incestuouos relationships?
DB ain't my brother if that's what you wanted to know.

I am pro- government keeping its nose to itself, since you asked. To convince me we should have laws about bedroom activity - any bedroom activity - between consenting adults, you need to demonstrate an overwhelming interest in regulating the particular behavior for the good of society. Otherwise you are just arguing that your own definitions of "natural behavior" and "common decency" should have the force of law.

In this day and age (thanks to contraception, pre-natal screening, etc.) it is really hard to make the social argument stick - so yes, I think laws should be relaxed accordingly - even laws about behavior which I have absolutely no personal interest in indulging. My personal interest or lack of it is utterly beside the point.
__________________
Need help? Contact a mod.

Reply With Quote
The following 6 users would like to thank MathNut for this useful post:
  #113  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:14
economisto
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
Why not? I am entitled to my own opinion and this is a discussion forum.
zzzz GG questioned your opinion and since this is a discussion forum please discuss or visit a monologue forum instead (twitter?)
Reply With Quote
This user groans at for this post:
  #114  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:14
Gastro Gnome's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Zürich
Posts: 3,553
Groaned at 49 Times in 35 Posts
Thanked 2,856 Times in 1,550 Posts
Gastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
Not level ,from the weird angle you are coming in at. Dragging the thread off into eugenics and gene therapy is moving too far away from the subject. You have no case to argue, Nature has made it's purpose clear, and designed us to avoid incest. There is nothing to be gained from incest, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.
All you keep doing is saying, "it's not natural", without any further justification for why that would be important, without any further explanation of what you consider 'natural', nor any real understanding of why contraception would make this line-of-reasoning redundant anyway.

The purpose of talking about eugenics to show the absurdity of one of your reasons . . . It also shows the dubious political angle.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:15
jj muge's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: BE
Posts: 249
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanked 189 Times in 108 Posts
jj muge has an excellent reputationjj muge has an excellent reputationjj muge has an excellent reputationjj muge has an excellent reputation
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
Now... where have I heard this argument before...?

Oh yes...

There is nothing to be gained from felatio, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

There is nothing to be gained from anal sex, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

There is nothing to be gained from cunnilingus, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

There is nothing to be gained from homosexuality, it is a selfish shallow act of abuse.

Describing sexual acts between consenting adults as "selfish, shallow acts of abuse" is a slippery road to go down.
So is sex on the pill, amongst other things. Are you quite so hysterical in your condemnation of that?
What is meant with abuse? An abuse of what?
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:17
NSchulzi's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Zug
Posts: 2,422
Groaned at 52 Times in 33 Posts
Thanked 2,523 Times in 1,215 Posts
NSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
zzzz GG questioned your opinion and since this is a discussion forum please discuss or visit a monologue forum instead (twitter?)
Go back to bed ... with whomsoever you wish.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:17
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
What is meant with abuse? An abuse of what?
Ask Upthehatters. He was the one who said it.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:18
Gastro Gnome's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Zürich
Posts: 3,553
Groaned at 49 Times in 35 Posts
Thanked 2,856 Times in 1,550 Posts
Gastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond reputeGastro Gnome has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
Why not? I am entitled to my own opinion and this is a discussion forum.
If you want other people to follow your moral rules, shouldn't we know what the justification for them is.

It's very unsatisfying in an argument to suddenly reach the point where someone says, "Well I think it's immoral". It's kind of a dead end for the discussion, but really it shouldn't be. Why should anyone be able to put forward unjustified opinions, especially in a discussion about what the law should be.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:18
economisto
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
What is meant with abuse? An abuse of what?
Exactly. No one really knows.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank for this useful post:
  #120  
Old 11.12.2010, 19:19
NSchulzi's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Zug
Posts: 2,422
Groaned at 52 Times in 33 Posts
Thanked 2,523 Times in 1,215 Posts
NSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond reputeNSchulzi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Bundesrat wants to remove incest law

Quote:
View Post
If you want other people to follow your moral rules, shouldn't we know what the justification for them is.

It's very unsatisfying in an argument to suddenly reach the point where someone says, "Well I think it's immoral". It's kind of a dead end for the discussion, but really it shouldn't be. Why should anyone be able to put forward unjustified opinions, especially in a discussion about what the law should be.
A quick look back at my previous posts in this thread will enlighten you to the fact that I have voiced several relevant beliefs about this whole subject ...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bundesrat, family, incest, intercourse, legislation




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We have a new girlie in the Bundesrat Assassin Swiss politics/news 68 29.09.2010 17:38
Didier Burkhalter, the new Bundesrat Wollishofener Swiss politics/news 13 12.10.2009 09:05
Election of Bundesrat Guest Swiss politics/news 138 07.03.2008 07:09
Remove Baseboards for Wardrobe? mgmidget72 Housing in general 7 06.09.2007 09:42


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0