| Quote: | |  | |
| Apparently in some cultures, the brutal, violent murder of one your offspring is less dishonourable than, e.g. having a Christian boyfriend. Until that mindset changes for millions of people, this kind of thing will continue to happen.
She should have gone to the police when he tried to electrocute him. At least there are laws here to protect people from this kind of vile cultural practice. | |
| | |
Here now under accusation by court is not what may be honourable or dishonourable somewhere but simply a 53 years old killer who committed premeditated murder. I only hope they do not go down to "Totschlag im Affekt" but regard it as what it was, and that is "Vorsätzlicher Mord".
Here above mentioned is of course the accusation of the Attorney of State for the Proscecution but neither the plea of the lawyer of the defence nor the verdict of the court.
************************************************** ***********************
| Quote: | |  | |
| I hope that you are only referring to English speaking western countries. Because in German, it's Ehrenmord and in French crime d'honneur (as far as I can remember, also Norwegian: æresdrap/æremord, Danish æresdrab, Dutch erenmoord). The reason given for these crimes is as bad a reason can be for a crime, nevertheless it's the one they claim to have for them. Hence the name.
But it may be totally different in the English language, no problem. | |
| | |
"Ehrenmord" may be a term in Germany, but here in Switzerland it either is Mord or Totschlag. A cousin of me who is lawyer for the defence in such a case would go for "Totschlag im Affekt" even if feeling personally for "geplanter Mord", and in view of his convincing capability would succeed to reduce the sentence from life-imprisonment to 10 or 15 years (only)
************************************************** ************************************
| Quote: | |  | |
| Why?
The term is often written within quotation marks precisely because of the point Nil makes above. | |
| | |
AND, the term of "honour crime" is not a
legal title at all. It therefore is used in the media, but in justice only in "quotation marks". And this applies to most countries on earth including countries where it happens a bit more often than over here. There is a very small number of countries where it is seen differently.
************************************************** ****************************