Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Swiss politics/news
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 24.09.2018, 11:27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Zürich
Posts: 45
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 21 Times in 11 Posts
CHnuschti has no particular reputation at present
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
That is why I would like to see an option to 'abstain' on the vote. Or in case of an election having the choice 'none of the above'.
In case of votes (Abstimmung) you can abstain, just leave blank. These votes are counted (as blanks of course), declared AFAIK and taken into account also for the turnout.
Only empty ballots in elections do not count and are regarded as "invalid". An if I'm not mistaken in most cases you can write ANY name in ballots, they are valid and accounted as "others" (Andere) in the results.


regards

Last edited by CHnuschti; 24.09.2018 at 11:50.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 24.09.2018, 12:03
Treverus's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 10,864
Groaned at 271 Times in 228 Posts
Thanked 20,058 Times in 7,307 Posts
Treverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
Only empty ballots in elections do not count and are regarded as "invalid". An if I'm not mistaken in most cases you can write ANY name in ballots, they are valid and accounted as "others" (Andere) in the results.
I had the honour to count votes before. Most boring job ever... but its important to a democracy. Do the people who actually care a favour and only throw a blank one in if you are so unhappy with the choices. Everything else needs to be evaluated. Not sure about the exact rules in CH, but in Germany does every vote count where the clear intention of the voter is apparent... say if a voter crosses out all the parties but one is the vote most likely going to count. Its just a pain for the people counting.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank Treverus for this useful post:
  #23  
Old 24.09.2018, 12:44
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 238
Groaned at 23 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 352 Times in 151 Posts
Plau Deri is considered knowledgeablePlau Deri is considered knowledgeablePlau Deri is considered knowledgeable
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

I am happy to be able to decide, whether or not I want to vote. There are enough topics, which are pretty complex or way out of the scope of my interests and I just don't know enough / cannot take the time to learn enough to build myself an educated and competent opinion.

In these cases, I think, it is better to STFU and let the experts have a go at it than to put in a vote "by the seat of the pants", just because it's my "right".

If only the politicians would do the same
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 24.09.2018, 12:58
Treverus's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 10,864
Groaned at 271 Times in 228 Posts
Thanked 20,058 Times in 7,307 Posts
Treverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond reputeTreverus has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post

In these cases, I think, it is better to STFU and let the experts have a go at it than to put in a vote "by the seat of the pants", just because it's my "right".

If only the politicians would do the same
I completely disagree: Switzerland is one of the countries where the experts have less power than in the rest of the Western world and it has been a great thing. Because experts have typically ties to the industries connected to their topics... so in the best case are they biased and in the worst case is the law written by a lobby group instead of the elected representatives.


There have been some votes in CH with stupid outcomes like the minaret bad, but there have been way more examples in the EU as well as the US where the lobbyists managed to get their points through against the popular opinion.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank Treverus for this useful post:
  #25  
Old 24.09.2018, 13:37
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 24,449
Groaned at 1,384 Times in 1,072 Posts
Thanked 28,155 Times in 13,453 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
There have been some votes in CH with stupid outcomes like the minaret ban.
How was that a stupid outcome?

I was quite pleased with it!

Tom
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #26  
Old 24.09.2018, 14:01
Loz1983's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zürich
Posts: 2,129
Groaned at 551 Times in 341 Posts
Thanked 8,869 Times in 3,554 Posts
Loz1983 has a reputation beyond reputeLoz1983 has a reputation beyond reputeLoz1983 has a reputation beyond reputeLoz1983 has a reputation beyond reputeLoz1983 has a reputation beyond reputeLoz1983 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
That is why I would like to see an option to 'abstain' on the vote. Or in case of an election having the choice 'none of the above'. Those little bits of information are invaluable in knowing the wishes of the people.

Everyone loves the direct democracy, but if they don't participate ...

Oh, and the naturalisation process makes it very clear the importance of citizens participation in the political process. Were they lying when they said that?
Direct democracy is great and I'm a firm supporter, however let's take this last vote as an example. I personally care about animal welfare and I do my best to try and source my meat, dairy and eggs from farms which have good husbandry and happy animals. I obviously don't care enough though or else I'd be vegan. I also care about those less well off being able to afford to eat meat. So all in all I'm quite firmly sat on the fence on the matter, and certainly not bothered enough about it to drag my ass out of bed to go and vote on it.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Loz1983 for this useful post:
  #27  
Old 24.09.2018, 14:03
Sandgrounder's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ZH
Posts: 11,918
Groaned at 108 Times in 101 Posts
Thanked 20,891 Times in 8,047 Posts
Sandgrounder has a reputation beyond reputeSandgrounder has a reputation beyond reputeSandgrounder has a reputation beyond reputeSandgrounder has a reputation beyond reputeSandgrounder has a reputation beyond reputeSandgrounder has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
Direct democracy is great and I'm a firm supporter, however let's take this last vote as an example. I personally care about animal welfare and I do my best to try and source my meat, dairy and eggs from farms which have good husbandry and happy animals. I obviously don't care enough though or else I'd be vegan. I also care about those less well off being able to afford to eat meat. So all in all I'm quite firmly sat on the fence on the matter, and certainly not bothered enough about it to drag my ass out of bed to go and vote on it.
You don't have to drag your ass out of bed. They send you the voting papers in the post. Or at least they do in our neck of the woods.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Sandgrounder for this useful post:
  #28  
Old 24.09.2018, 14:06
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 238
Groaned at 23 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 352 Times in 151 Posts
Plau Deri is considered knowledgeablePlau Deri is considered knowledgeablePlau Deri is considered knowledgeable
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
Because experts have typically ties to the industries connected to their topics... so in the best case are they biased and in the worst case is the law written by a lobby group instead of the elected representatives.
Yes, lobbyists are a pest. And so are many of those, who write the comments on articles from "Blick" and "20 Minuten". Wonder, how democracy survived all these
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 24.09.2018, 14:12
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 9,759
Groaned at 197 Times in 168 Posts
Thanked 19,138 Times in 8,136 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
Direct democracy is great and I'm a firm supporter, however let's take this last vote as an example. I personally care about animal welfare and I do my best to try and source my meat, dairy and eggs from farms which have good husbandry and happy animals. I obviously don't care enough though or else I'd be vegan. I also care about those less well off being able to afford to eat meat. So all in all I'm quite firmly sat on the fence on the matter, and certainly not bothered enough about it to drag my ass out of bed to go and vote on it.
This, exactly.

And furthermore, the posters and parts of the public debate reduce what is a complex and multi-layered topic to something black and white. Vote for the initiative, and you push poor people into starvation, vote against it and you support the torture of animals. So both ways, you're an inhumane barsteward.

At the end of the day, a vote is always going to be yes versus no. But my feeling is that the level of public debate has slipped over these last few years.

Maybe also to do with many initiatives of late being all versus nothing rather than some small changes in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post:
  #30  
Old 24.09.2018, 14:33
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 24,449
Groaned at 1,384 Times in 1,072 Posts
Thanked 28,155 Times in 13,453 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
You don't have to drag your ass out of bed. They send you the voting papers in the post. Or at least they do in our neck of the woods.
Or do both.

My wife signed hers, and I handed them in Sunday morning (to save on postage).

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 24.09.2018, 21:06
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Neuchatel
Posts: 21,782
Groaned at 504 Times in 381 Posts
Thanked 24,685 Times in 11,248 Posts
Odile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond reputeOdile has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

The Röschtigrabe is certainly alive and well ...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 24.09.2018, 21:11
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 24,449
Groaned at 1,384 Times in 1,072 Posts
Thanked 28,155 Times in 13,453 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
The Röschtigrabe is certainly alive and well ...
As is the south/west divide.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 24.09.2018, 21:16
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Zurich East
Posts: 608
Groaned at 53 Times in 37 Posts
Thanked 702 Times in 350 Posts
YuropFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeYuropFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeYuropFlyer has a reputation beyond reputeYuropFlyer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
Or do both.

My wife signed hers, and I handed them in Sunday morning (to save on postage).

Tom
It's free in Zürich, and as much I'm aware while they say you should pay postage in some other Kanton's, they won't charge you (and still count your vote) if you don't pay for postage
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 24.09.2018, 21:19
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 24,449
Groaned at 1,384 Times in 1,072 Posts
Thanked 28,155 Times in 13,453 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
It's free in Zürich, and as much I'm aware while they say you should pay postage in some other Kanton's, they won't charge you (and still count your vote) if you don't pay for postage
I'll have to ask, but as the commune box is 10m from the PO box, the point is moot.

Tom
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #35  
Old 25.09.2018, 09:57
Caleb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sevelen, SG
Posts: 417
Groaned at 5 Times in 4 Posts
Thanked 484 Times in 206 Posts
Caleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
How was that a stupid outcome?

I was quite pleased with it!

Tom
Oh, come on, Tom. Do you really think that such a superficial topic deserves a place in the Constitution, even if it passed with 2/3 of the votes? It doesn't ban mosques, it bans an architectural feature of the mosque, the "bell tower". And as far as I can recall, it doesn't even ban mosque speakers. Just the tower. It's just silly.

Plus it introduces a contradiction in the constitution in regards to freedom of religion, and makes Switzerland look bad in front of the world (I remember reading lots of articles condemning the resolution). So all we really got was no new minarets built (but the existing ones remained). I think it'd be better to focus on things that are more important.
__________________
HEAVEN IS A BATHTUB WITH BOOKS THAT DON'T GET WET
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank Caleb for this useful post:
  #36  
Old 25.09.2018, 10:48
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 9,759
Groaned at 197 Times in 168 Posts
Thanked 19,138 Times in 8,136 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
View Post
Oh, come on, Tom. Do you really think that such a superficial topic deserves a place in the Constitution, even if it passed with 2/3 of the votes? It doesn't ban mosques, it bans an architectural feature of the mosque, the "bell tower". And as far as I can recall, it doesn't even ban mosque speakers. Just the tower. It's just silly.
If you spool the film a bit further back you will recall that it all started when a mosque didn't get a permit to build a minaret because a local planning law said you cannot build higher than this. They had a court rule that religious freedom can overrule urban planning regulations. That was the real silliness. And then came the vote and they got the pushback they had been asking for. So I say good riddance to them. Just a pity for all the more reasobale muslims who would never have done something so silly.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank amogles for this useful post:
  #37  
Old 25.09.2018, 11:48
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ostschweiz
Posts: 6,176
Groaned at 208 Times in 178 Posts
Thanked 7,760 Times in 4,051 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 37%, a measly 37%.

Quote:
It's free in Zürich, and as much I'm aware while they say you should pay postage in some other Kanton's, they won't charge you (and still count your vote) if you don't pay for postage
At this point it's a Cantonal decision to prepay the postage, some leave the decision to their communes.

However the Nationalrat recently voted for a motion to have the postage prepaid by the federal government. A few years ago the Ständerat voted against the same or similar proposition so it's far from clear what will happen this time around.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5 pairs of shoes for sale, like new, size 37-37 1/2-38 Lali81 Items for sale 0 30.04.2015 21:21
Wanted skates (Schlittschuhe) size 37-38 Valenta Items wanted 0 12.10.2013 00:44
Guess sandals no 37 for sale emmanouela Items for sale 10 19.05.2013 21:51
WANTED: TV 37"+ (Flatscreen) gaz_0001 Items wanted 0 16.08.2012 14:11
Wanted : winter boots Eur 37 (zurich) pickles Items wanted 1 19.08.2010 19:47


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0