Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Swiss politics/news  
View Poll Results: On which initiatives will you vote yes
Popular initiative “For clean drinking water and healthy food" 19 45.24%
Popular initiative “For a Switzerland without artificial pesticides” 18 42.86%
COVID-19 Act 21 50.00%
CO2 Act 16 38.10%
Federal Act on Police Measures to Combat Terrorism 13 30.95%
None of the above 11 26.19%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27.04.2021, 08:40
Capitan Harlock's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Geneva
Posts: 110
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 77 Times in 42 Posts
Capitan Harlock is considered knowledgeableCapitan Harlock is considered knowledgeableCapitan Harlock is considered knowledgeable
Vote June 13th 2021

Soooo new round of votes in June, another mixed bunch of topics.

1- Popular initiative “For clean drinking water and healthy food"
2- Popular initiative “For a Switzerland without artificial pesticides”
3- COVID-19 Act
4- CO2 Act
5- Federal Act on Police Measures to Combat Terrorism

I have to say before seeing any opinion poll that I'm genuine clueless on what the Swiss will vote on 1 and 2. I think 4 might still pass easily as the "green wave" seems still go strong both on the left and right.

What do you think? Your opinions and what you will vote if you are a citizen and not an Auslander like me
This user would like to thank Capitan Harlock for this useful post:
  #2  
Old 27.04.2021, 09:46
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Basel
Posts: 34
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 45 Times in 21 Posts
ThisIsFine has made some interesting contributions
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

It seems you need an option for "will vote but won't vote yes on any of these" in order to have a denominator for your polling.
This user would like to thank ThisIsFine for this useful post:
  #3  
Old 01.05.2021, 15:23
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SG
Posts: 9,292
Groaned at 480 Times in 361 Posts
Thanked 12,369 Times in 6,420 Posts
Urs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond reputeUrs Max has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
It seems you need an option for "will vote but won't vote yes on any of these" in order to have a denominator for your polling.
Also, it may be useful to add something like "1-2 No" and "3-4 No", very few will be against all five.
  #4  
Old 27.04.2021, 09:51
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post

What do you think?
I think that if you want to discuss them here it would be really useful if you were to say something more about the measures being proposed. Otherwise you'll only get opinions from those people already engaged enough to know what they're all about.
The following 5 users would like to thank for this useful post:
  #5  
Old 27.04.2021, 10:40
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vaud
Posts: 2,459
Groaned at 175 Times in 122 Posts
Thanked 4,947 Times in 1,902 Posts
Mikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond reputeMikers has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
I think that if you want to discuss them here it would be really useful if you were to say something more about the measures being proposed. Otherwise you'll only get opinions from those people already engaged enough to know what they're all about.
Yes can someone tell me what the CO2 act is please ?
  #6  
Old 27.04.2021, 10:54
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 31,780
Groaned at 2,368 Times in 1,722 Posts
Thanked 38,746 Times in 18,256 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
Yes can someone tell me what the CO2 act is please ?
https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/do...3/co2-act.html

Tom
  #7  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:53
curley's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: canton ZH
Posts: 13,105
Groaned at 218 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 15,227 Times in 7,826 Posts
curley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

That link gives no information. Is that enough for you to make decisions on?
  #8  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:55
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Basel
Posts: 34
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanked 45 Times in 21 Posts
ThisIsFine has made some interesting contributions
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
That link gives no information. Is that enough for you to make decisions on?
If you change the language to a national one, there is more text. We will also receive a booklet with significantly more info when we get our ballots.
  #9  
Old 27.04.2021, 10:54
Belgianmum's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 13,051
Groaned at 231 Times in 194 Posts
Thanked 21,572 Times in 8,837 Posts
Belgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond reputeBelgianmum has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

I have no idea what the two votes actually involve but there is a very strong NO to the first two around these parts.
There have been huge boards up in farmers filelds all over the place for a couple of weeks already all saying 2X NON.
  #10  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:47
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 2,130
Groaned at 99 Times in 73 Posts
Thanked 4,033 Times in 1,569 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
I have no idea what the two votes actually involve but there is a very strong NO to the first two around these parts.
There have been huge boards up in farmers filelds all over the place for a couple of weeks already all saying 2X NON.
I think the first says that farmers using pesticides won't get subsidies anymore, or at least less.

The second one wants to ban pesticides completely.

The second will fail no doubt, but the progressive city people might actually put the first in play. Of course, they have no clue about farming, but hey they also think wolves are cute and their population cannot be regulated.
This user would like to thank komsomolez for this useful post:
  #11  
Old 30.04.2021, 21:24
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olten
Posts: 559
Groaned at 59 Times in 47 Posts
Thanked 448 Times in 268 Posts
hoover1 has earned the respect of manyhoover1 has earned the respect of manyhoover1 has earned the respect of many
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
I think the first says that farmers using pesticides won't get subsidies anymore, or at least less.

The second one wants to ban pesticides completely.

The second will fail no doubt, but the progressive city people might actually put the first in play. Of course, they have no clue about farming, but hey they also think wolves are cute and their population cannot be regulated.
voting doesn't work that way - you need double majority and it be downvoted by all the farmer / small and agriculture dependent cantons - I'd give it 58% yes but only 12 cantons.
This user would like to thank hoover1 for this useful post:
  #12  
Old 30.04.2021, 23:20
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CH
Posts: 153
Groaned at 4 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 293 Times in 119 Posts
missenglish has a reputation beyond reputemissenglish has a reputation beyond reputemissenglish has a reputation beyond reputemissenglish has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
View Post
I have no idea what the two votes actually involve but there is a very strong NO to the first two around these parts.
There have been huge boards up in farmers filelds all over the place for a couple of weeks already all saying 2X NON.
Historical background:

That‘s the farmers‘ vote. They make up a small percentage of the population but a very vocal one, and one that has been and still is over-represented in Parliament, largely by the SVP (which started out as the BGB, the Bauern- und Gewerbepartei). This is why the Agrarpolitik 22 bill failed to make it through Parliament, though the reforms it proposed would have been quite gentle.

Farming is a very traditional business in Switzerland as farms are hardly ever for sale. Instead, they are passed on over generations. They also tend to merge, meaning there are even fewer available for people with less traditional ideas.

We have been adding several thousand tons of excess nitrogen compounds and phosphorus to the soil for decades, as well as about 2000 tons of pesticides. Lakes like the Hallwiler- and the Baldeggersee have been artificially ventilated since the 1980s. They need less oxygen now, but they still can‘t do without. If anyone‘s interested: https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/en/ho...-in-lakes.html

One obvious solution would be to reduce the number of livestock. If the Trinkwasserinitiative was accepted, we‘d probably have to do that. From what I’ve read so far, it proposes three limitations to the federal direct payments that are a main source of income for many farmers. Given that we can produce practically 100% of meat and dairy demand on our own territory but less than half of demand for plant-based food, and given that plant-based food yields more calories per area, the general idea of reducing livestock strikes me as sensible. (Source for those percentages: agrarbericht.ch.)

What the Trinkwasserinitiative wants:

First, that farmers should only receive direct payments if they do not keep no more animals than they can feed from local produce. This is usually not the case today. Soy imports for fodder have tripled since the 90s and are currently about 280‘000 tons a year, mainly from Mato Grosso in Brazil. Which is a problem because soy is fast replacing the rain forest there.

Second, that such direct payments should only go to farmers who do not use prophylactic antibiotics on a routine basis. As an MD (for humans, not animals) I find this entirely reasonable. Antibiotic resistance is a problem. We should use them judiciously.

Third, that direct payments should go only to farmers who do not use pesticides. The need for reducing pesticides in our drinking water is debatable, but it is too easy to say it’s not a problem: exposure to pesticides has been linked pretty solidly to reduced sperm quality. Shanna Swan (in Count Down) argues that we might become infertile on a huge scale. True, the culprits are probably not only pesticides; look it up if you like. Then again, reduced human fertility would certainly solve a problem or two, so feel free!

For me personally, that makes two and a half reasons to vote yes, as opposed to 0.5 points in favour of a no. So it’s a clear yes to the Trinkwasserinitiative on my part.

So far, I‘m less clear on the Pestizidinitiative, which demands an outright ban on pesticides.

Quote:
View Post
Bunch of hypocrites if the CO2 vote goes through.

What about personal responsibility?

In other words, perhaps people here could consider not buying the biggest, fastest Audis, Mercedes and BMWs with the biggest and most unnecessary engines.

Sure, increasing duty on cars with these engines will be part of the law but can't people just avoid buying these cars themselves?
I hear you. Swiss cars are the heaviest and priciest in Europe. I‘m all for personal responsibility and have been car-free for years. But in a society this dedicated to the dance around the golden calf, personal responsibility would benefit from a nudge. It‘s not as though it‘d hurt someone who can afford a Porsche Cayenne.

The CO2 law proposes the following measures (German): https://www.uvek.admin.ch/uvek/de/ho...o2-gesetz.html

Several of them already exist. E.g. the CO2 fee on fuels. It gets partially redustributed to the population every year, meaning that those who use little fossil fuels actually make a (small) profit. You may have noticed it in your Krankenkassenabrechnung.

Up to now, kerosene was exempt from this fee, which is absurd given that its greenhouse effect is larger than that of petrol used in cars, partly due to the higher altitude. Private planes would have to pay too, so - continued cos I dunno how to quote two posts in one -

Quote:
View Post
The phasing out of the oil and gas heating systems looks fine in the long term. Maybe stop thinking about the environment and think about the prices oscillations of oil and gas, and dependence of foreign resources. If heating solutions relying on local resources are developed, people will be thankful one day for not being dependent on the mood changes of a foreign dictator.

The flight ticket tax is complicate. In one hand, it may make the train look more attractive. On the other hand, people may just go to EuroAirport in France. So, a tax that makes air travel more expensive from Zurich and Geneva unless some cooperation with France is agreed.

And, what about private and recreational aviation? A tax on commercial flights would be a tax on the poor that cannot afford private flight. A Gulfstream G650 or a Bombardier Global 7500 have a range between 12K-13K km and fuel capacity of 20 tons. If Easyjet passengers end up paying CO2 tax and Davos crowd doesn't, we have a problem.
In response to your last paragraph: the Davos crowd (will they ever return?) would pay too. Quote from the link in the previous post: „Für Geschäfts- und Privatjets gibt es neu eine Lenkungsabgabe. Pro Flug ist je nach Distanz und Gewicht des Jets eine Abgabe zwischen 500 und 3000 Fr. fällig. Die Hälfte der Gelder wird gleichmässig an die Bevölkerung zurückverteilt. Der Rest fliesst in den Klimafonds.“

As for airports across the border: they already have fees. Switzerland has been an island. See https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luftverkehrabgabe.

I could not agree more with „dependence on foreign resources“! What‘s more, oil and gas tend to come from states that either suffer from the resource curse (e.g. Nigeria - read Helon Habila‘s Oil on Water) or that are undemocratic and corrupt in other respects (e.g. Kazakhstan, Libya, Russia). Source: https://www.watson.ch/wirtschaft/wis...nten-seit-1988 and https://www.republik.ch/2020/10/07/d...zer-gasbranche

The Swiss Parliament is firmly centre-right, yet they approved this law. The measures proposed are a small step, but it is a step in the right direction. My vote is a yes for certain. I admit to being a science nerd and believing in logic and reason, and to taking climate change quite seriously. As do the 100+ Swiss scientists who joined the committee in favour of the proposed law: https://ethz.ch/de/news-und-veransta...einordnen.html

Last edited by 3Wishes; 01.05.2021 at 13:27. Reason: merging consecutive replies; please use multi-quote
The following 6 users would like to thank missenglish for this useful post:
  #13  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:01
Axa's Avatar
Axa Axa is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Suhr, Aargau
Posts: 3,272
Groaned at 40 Times in 40 Posts
Thanked 4,396 Times in 2,031 Posts
Axa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
Yes can someone tell me what the CO2 act is please ?
News description of the act:

Quote:
The CO2 law contains various measures to reduce Swiss greenhouse emissions in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. The measures include new taxes on airline flights, rules for more climate-friendly buildings, and tighter targets for vehicle emissions.
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/climate...-vote/46280546

A description from the people supporting the YES vote:

Quote:
- Climate-compatible building heating: From 2023 or 2026, emission thresholds will apply if heating systems are replaced. This will mean that new oil and gas heating systems will only be installed in exceptional cases.
- Gradual increase of CO2 tax and strengthening of building programme: To support the overhaul of buildings from an energy perspective, funding via government and cantonal building programmes is being expanded. This is being financed through the partial allocation of the steering tax on heating oil and natural gas to the climate fund.
- Flight ticket tax: Through the introduction of a steering tax on flight tickets that is based on distance travelled, the steady growth in flights is to be checked in a socially compatible way. Half of this is to be redistributed to the population, and the other half will flow into the new climate fund.
- Climate fund: As well as building renovation, the newly created fund aims, in particular, to promote the development and widespread use of new approaches and technologies, especially in the flight industry. The greenhouse gas emissions caused by Swiss consumption abroad now exceed emissions in Switzerland. The climate fund is intended to contribute to a reduction of the same magnitude.
https://www.myclimate.org/informatio...l/co2-act-yes/

The phasing out of the oil and gas heating systems looks fine in the long term. Maybe stop thinking about the environment and think about the prices oscillations of oil and gas, and dependence of foreign resources. If heating solutions relying on local resources are developed, people will be thankful one day for not being dependent on the mood changes of a foreign dictator.

The flight ticket tax is complicate. In one hand, it may make the train look more attractive. On the other hand, people may just go to EuroAirport in France. So, a tax that makes air travel more expensive from Zurich and Geneva unless some cooperation with France is agreed.

And, what about private and recreational aviation? A tax on commercial flights would be a tax on the poor that cannot afford private flight. A Gulfstream G650 or a Bombardier Global 7500 have a range between 12K-13K km and fuel capacity of 20 tons. If Easyjet passengers end up paying CO2 tax and Davos crowd doesn't, we have a problem.
The following 4 users would like to thank Axa for this useful post:
  #14  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:34
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Nyon
Posts: 5,200
Groaned at 292 Times in 206 Posts
Thanked 7,108 Times in 3,345 Posts
bowlie has a reputation beyond reputebowlie has a reputation beyond reputebowlie has a reputation beyond reputebowlie has a reputation beyond reputebowlie has a reputation beyond reputebowlie has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

The flight tax based on distance travelled is complicated and easy to get around.

If you want to go to Dubai and wish to avoid the tax you buy a one way ticket to Paris and a second ticket Paris Dubai Zurich. Who suffers? SWISS.

And what about cargo? Long haul flights are usually full of Cargo why doesn’t the tax apply to them?

While I agree in Principle with the vote, I certainly don’t agree with some of the ‘solutions’. They need further thought.
  #15  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:40
Axa's Avatar
Axa Axa is offline
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Suhr, Aargau
Posts: 3,272
Groaned at 40 Times in 40 Posts
Thanked 4,396 Times in 2,031 Posts
Axa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond reputeAxa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
The flight tax based on distance travelled is complicated and easy to get around.

If you want to go to Dubai and wish to avoid the tax you buy a one way ticket to Paris and a second ticket Paris Dubai Zurich. Who suffers? SWISS.
France is much closer: Basel/Mulhouse/Freiburg EuroAirport
  #16  
Old 27.04.2021, 11:51
curley's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: canton ZH
Posts: 13,105
Groaned at 218 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 15,227 Times in 7,826 Posts
curley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond reputecurley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
.... And, what about private and recreational aviation? A tax on commercial flights would be a tax on the poor that cannot afford private flight. A Gulfstream G650 or a Bombardier Global 7500 have a range between 12K-13K km and fuel capacity of 20 tons. If Easyjet passengers end up paying CO2 tax and Davos crowd doesn't, we have a problem.
Quick check: Stuttgart - Gatwick Euro 25.87. SERIOUSLY?

That's cheaper than the amount of shoes I'd need to buy for walking. And don't tell me, me breathing on the way is worse.

this is not a vote pro the law, I did not study it in detail yet.
This user would like to thank curley for this useful post:
  #17  
Old 27.04.2021, 10:56
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zurich
Posts: 13,355
Groaned at 1,238 Times in 821 Posts
Thanked 19,388 Times in 7,504 Posts
Chuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond reputeChuff has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
I think that if you want to discuss them here it would be really useful if you were to say something more about the measures being proposed. Otherwise you'll only get opinions from those people already engaged enough to know what they're all about.
Details here, I had to google them too https://www.admin.ch/gov/en/start/do...ion/votes.html
The following 2 users would like to thank Chuff for this useful post:
  #18  
Old 27.04.2021, 10:51
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 31,780
Groaned at 2,368 Times in 1,722 Posts
Thanked 38,746 Times in 18,256 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

You need to add the option: None of the above.

Tom
This user would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post:
  #19  
Old 01.05.2021, 13:27
3Wishes's Avatar
Moderately Amused
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bern area
Posts: 11,145
Groaned at 88 Times in 84 Posts
Thanked 18,867 Times in 8,403 Posts
3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute3Wishes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
You need to add the option: None of the above.

Tom
Done.
The following 2 users would like to thank 3Wishes for this useful post:
  #20  
Old 01.05.2021, 13:29
st2lemans's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lugano
Posts: 31,780
Groaned at 2,368 Times in 1,722 Posts
Thanked 38,746 Times in 18,256 Posts
st2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond reputest2lemans has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote June 13th 2021

Quote:
View Post
Done.
Thanks!

Voted!

Tom
 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3.5 Zimmer Apartment available in Zug (Riedmatt) from 1st June 2021 akk Property offered 2 15.07.2021 14:18
Vote 7th March 2021 Sean Connery Swiss politics/news 457 13.03.2021 22:28
Vote today 5th June marton Swiss politics/news 19 06.06.2016 11:42
Day Trip to Konstanz, Germany on June 13th The Real Stig Travel/day trips/free time 7 22.06.2011 08:29
World wide knit in public day June 13th MusicChick Daily life 2 09.06.2009 12:41


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0