Go Back   English Forum Switzerland > Living in Switzerland > Swiss politics/news  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:21
My2pups's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Used to be Zurich
Posts: 1,706
Groaned at 94 Times in 64 Posts
Thanked 1,989 Times in 870 Posts
My2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Don't be an ass...

Quote:
View Post
But it's what you wrote:


How many possibilities are there to give birth (in the case of men)?

Did you get dropped on the head as a baby?
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank My2pups for this useful post:
  #22  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:22
Tom1234's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kanton Luzern
Posts: 17,466
Groaned at 686 Times in 534 Posts
Thanked 26,613 Times in 10,738 Posts
Tom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post

2) No and the same question to you - just to understand the reason of your aggressive behavior..
Rather than red rep me, perhaps you ought to re-phrase your previous statement so it actually makes sense?

Are you worried that if a gay couple adopt, they may make the children gay?

Or is it something else?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:23
Tom1234's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kanton Luzern
Posts: 17,466
Groaned at 686 Times in 534 Posts
Thanked 26,613 Times in 10,738 Posts
Tom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Don't be an ass...
Are you now a forum moderator?

Are you calling me an ass? I thought naming-calling wasn't allowed?
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users groan at Tom1234 for this post:
  #24  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:25
My2pups's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Used to be Zurich
Posts: 1,706
Groaned at 94 Times in 64 Posts
Thanked 1,989 Times in 870 Posts
My2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond reputeMy2pups has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

I am saying don't be one...

I am a spam deputy, so exerting the authority vested in me to call out bad behavior...

Quote:
View Post
Are you now a forum moderator?

Are you calling me an ass? I thought naming-calling wasn't allowed?
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank My2pups for this useful post:
This user groans at My2pups for this post:
  #25  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:27
Tom1234's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kanton Luzern
Posts: 17,466
Groaned at 686 Times in 534 Posts
Thanked 26,613 Times in 10,738 Posts
Tom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond reputeTom1234 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
I am saying don't be one...

I am a spam deputy, so exerting the authority vested in me to call out bad behavior...
Your authority pertains to dealing with the posts that fit the category which the title "spam deputy" suggests.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:33
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Zug
Posts: 177
Groaned at 51 Times in 27 Posts
Thanked 206 Times in 99 Posts
jamon8 has become a little unpopular
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Rather than red rep me, perhaps you ought to re-phrase your previous statement so it actually makes sense?

Are you worried that if a gay couple adopt, they may make the children gay?

Or is it something else?
I never said anything like this. These are all your aggravated issues (fell free to re-phrase correctly). And yes, don’t be an ass
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank jamon8 for this useful post:
  #27  
Old 10.09.2021, 15:40
komsomolez's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SZ
Posts: 3,519
Groaned at 326 Times in 228 Posts
Thanked 7,191 Times in 3,061 Posts
komsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond reputekomsomolez has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Do you mean adoption?

I think this is the only controversial question - very few would argue that homosexual couples must have the same status in the society, but considerably more would be against children adoption by them.
Absolutely. If this was without the adoption part, I am sure it would pass with 75% or more. When you drill down in the polling, you will note that - although majority in favor of the law - close to 50% of center/right voters (FDP, CVP) have reservations when it comes to gay abortion rights. And I can perfectly understand this.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank komsomolez for this useful post:
  #28  
Old 10.09.2021, 16:03
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 12,361
Groaned at 338 Times in 274 Posts
Thanked 26,263 Times in 11,000 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
close to 50% of center/right voters (FDP, CVP) have reservations when it comes to gay abortion rights. And I can perfectly understand this.
Why should gay people have different abortion rights to straight people?

Who even suggested this should be an issue?

Where are you getting this nonsense from?
Reply With Quote
The following 5 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post:
  #29  
Old 10.09.2021, 16:05
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,189
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,670 Times in 1,284 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Why should gay people have different abortion rights to straight people?

Who even suggested this should be an issue?

Where are you getting this nonsense from?

Pretty sure auto correct or something changed adoption to abortion. Everyone’s getting trigger happy.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #30  
Old 10.09.2021, 16:51
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zentralschweiz
Posts: 129
Groaned at 46 Times in 19 Posts
Thanked 246 Times in 79 Posts
wachtwoord has a reputation beyond reputewachtwoord has a reputation beyond reputewachtwoord has a reputation beyond reputewachtwoord has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Pretty sure auto correct or something changed adoption to abortion. Everyone’s getting trigger happy.
Cartman's mom once made the same mix up in South Park. Tried the whole episode to get Cartman (an 8 years old boy) aborted. Hilarious episode

Refarding the vote: yes for the marriage proposal, no to the tax proposal. An argument against gay marriage by the Christians not mentioned in this thread thus far that I understand (but don't agree with as the ship has sailed) is that marriage is a religious institution in which the state should have no say. Historically speaking they have a strong point.
Reply With Quote
This user would like to thank wachtwoord for this useful post:
  #31  
Old 10.09.2021, 16:58
ennui's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kt Zurich
Posts: 1,189
Groaned at 36 Times in 28 Posts
Thanked 3,670 Times in 1,284 Posts
ennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond reputeennui has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Cartman's mom once made the same mix up in South Park. Tried the whole episode to get Cartman (an 8 years old boy) aborted. Hilarious episode

Refarding the vote: yes for the marriage proposal, no to the tax proposal. An argument against gay marriage by the Christians not mentioned in this thread thus far that I understand (but don't agree with as the ship has sailed) is that marriage is a religious institution in which the state should have no say. Historically speaking they have a strong point.
Yes, but by the same token, what about civil marriages…..many people have only a civil marriage, sanctioned by the state.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank ennui for this useful post:
  #32  
Old 10.09.2021, 17:04
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 12,361
Groaned at 338 Times in 274 Posts
Thanked 26,263 Times in 11,000 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Yes, but by the same token, what about civil marriages…..many people have only a civil marriage, sanctioned by the state.
In the best of all possible worlds I think the state should not issue or regulate marriage certificates, but that people should be able to go to a lawyer or notary and notarize their relationship by means of private contract in any constellation they please, and regulate rights of visitation, care, medical decisions over one another, sharing of assets, inheritance etc in any way they please. What's wrong with polygamy, for example, as long as all parties involved are consenting adults and all agree to the terms of their own free will?

In the interests of separation of Church and State formal traditional marriages should be a church-only issue. There are BTW churches who don't have a problem with same sex weddings, and everybody has the right to chose their church or have none. I don't think the churches need the state to spell this stuff out to them.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post:
  #33  
Old 10.09.2021, 17:59
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,155
Groaned at 30 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 533 Times in 353 Posts
minimimi has earned the respect of manyminimimi has earned the respect of manyminimimi has earned the respect of many
Re: Vote September 26th

This is more of an answer to rainer_d in "housing bubble" thread, to not write there

I believe that people should be given opportunities, e.g. education should be more equal and there are countries managing it better than Switzerland. Of course, people are not created equal and absolute equality is not possible. E.g. intelligence (let's not go to definition or distribution) is important for many successes, including academic and that is one's personal luck or not.

I also believe that safety nets should exist when someone has problems out of their direct control, e.g. health problems.

And taxes should be used for these things (of course many other things, including infrastructure).

But there is a point where if you don't give enough incentive to people to work many won't. That border is different for different people. It is not only relying on social help but also not studying enough expecting that whatever you do someone will bail you out.

I have also heard directly from people misusing the system. Though I cannot know how common that is. Also some stuff that costs taxpayers a lot is just thrown money but no idea how to make the system more efficient hence cannot say much.

Current system in Switzerland works quite well in Switzerland but this low income difference (especially after taxes - last it was 2.6x on upper and lower 10%) may not be encouraging enough.

Also the Swiss safety net is encouraging enough for people to take on risks (e.g. startups). But it also requires people to have a good enough pay-off for unslept nights.

One should remember that most of people are willing to take risks and put extra effort if the pay-off is good enough. Should people who studied and had very little free time really get compensated almost equally as those who did not? One's salary is not only what that person is doing at that moment but also all the effort and investment that brought to that point.

Regarding rich avoiding tax: I am sure there are many who do. Probably some try more some less. But in Switzerland top 5% earner pay huge taxes and there's not much legal to avoid that (we pay almost the same tax as in California which has one of the highest rates in the US). The easiest is to found a company but not something suitable for every job.

Anyways, majority of Swiss citizens pay very little tax and no way this country could function the way it does without the tax from the "rich".
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank minimimi for this useful post:
  #34  
Old 10.09.2021, 18:00
Caleb's Avatar
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Zürich
Posts: 1,227
Groaned at 14 Times in 12 Posts
Thanked 2,282 Times in 859 Posts
Caleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

It MUST be Friday. The thread got detailed in under 10 posts, name-calling in under 15.

Back on topic: I can’t vote just yet (I still need to wait about a year for our papers to go through), but for me it’d be a clear YES for “Ehe für Alle” and a NO for “Kapital besteuern”, on the principle that the initiative itself lacks in accuracy and detail (although I fully agree with the principle).
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank Caleb for this useful post:
  #35  
Old 10.09.2021, 18:08
nickatbasel's Avatar
Mod, Chips and Mushy Peas
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albisrieden
Posts: 5,453
Groaned at 168 Times in 105 Posts
Thanked 8,727 Times in 3,235 Posts
nickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

I will be voting YES to same sex marriages. Some of the homophobic posters from the NO campaign are quite disgusting. Sadly, gay bashing happens far too frequently - particularly in Zurich.
Reply With Quote
The following 4 users would like to thank nickatbasel for this useful post:
This user groans at nickatbasel for this post:
  #36  
Old 10.09.2021, 18:10
nickatbasel's Avatar
Mod, Chips and Mushy Peas
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Albisrieden
Posts: 5,453
Groaned at 168 Times in 105 Posts
Thanked 8,727 Times in 3,235 Posts
nickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond reputenickatbasel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
Your authority pertains to dealing with the posts that fit the category which the title "spam deputy" suggests.
Basically glorified milk monitor.
Reply With Quote
The following 3 users would like to thank nickatbasel for this useful post:
  #37  
Old 10.09.2021, 18:10
amogles's Avatar
Forum Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Zurich
Posts: 12,361
Groaned at 338 Times in 274 Posts
Thanked 26,263 Times in 11,000 Posts
amogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond reputeamogles has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
This is more of an answer to rainer_d in "housing bubble" thread, to not write there

I believe that people should be given opportunities, e.g. education should be more equal and there are countries managing it better than Switzerland. Of course, people are not created equal and absolute equality is not possible. E.g. intelligence (let's not go to definition or distribution) is important for many successes, including academic and that is one's personal luck or not.

I also believe that safety nets should exist when someone has problems out of their direct control, e.g. health problems.

And taxes should be used for these things (of course many other things, including infrastructure).

But there is a point where if you don't give enough incentive to people to work many won't. That border is different for different people. It is not only relying on social help but also not studying enough expecting that whatever you do someone will bail you out.

I have also heard directly from people misusing the system. Though I cannot know how common that is. Also some stuff that costs taxpayers a lot is just thrown money but no idea how to make the system more efficient hence cannot say much.

Current system in Switzerland works quite well in Switzerland but this low income difference (especially after taxes - last it was 2.6x on upper and lower 10%) may not be encouraging enough.

Also the Swiss safety net is encouraging enough for people to take on risks (e.g. startups). But it also requires people to have a good enough pay-off for unslept nights.

One should remember that most of people are willing to take risks and put extra effort if the pay-off is good enough. Should people who studied and had very little free time really get compensated almost equally as those who did not? One's salary is not only what that person is doing at that moment but also all the effort and investment that brought to that point.

Regarding rich avoiding tax: I am sure there are many who do. Probably some try more some less. But in Switzerland top 5% earner pay huge taxes and there's not much legal to avoid that (we pay almost the same tax as in California which has one of the highest rates in the US). The easiest is to found a company but not something suitable for every job.

Anyways, majority of Swiss citizens pay very little tax and no way this country could function the way it does without the tax from the "rich".
I think Switzerland does by and large do these things well.

Of course you can always nitpick and find cases where the system is not working, but you can do that for any country and system.

By and large Switzerland is fiscally cautious. Money is spent wisely and effectively and nonsense spending projects are not popular. The education system is very good and overall skill levels are high, not just among the top few percentile of university kids but across all strata of the education system. There is also good social mobility and plenty of opportunities for people who want to take them.

Infrastructure is among the best in the world with virtually everything being maintained in perfect condition.

All this comes at a price of course, but people have social and civic responsibility and populist positions based on envy and hate of those richer than themselves are typically turned down at the polls.
Reply With Quote
The following 6 users would like to thank amogles for this useful post:
  #38  
Old 10.09.2021, 21:37
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,155
Groaned at 30 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 533 Times in 353 Posts
minimimi has earned the respect of manyminimimi has earned the respect of manyminimimi has earned the respect of many
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
I think Switzerland does by and large do these things well.

Of course you can always nitpick and find cases where the system is not working, but you can do that for any country and system.

By and large Switzerland is fiscally cautious. Money is spent wisely and effectively and nonsense spending projects are not popular. The education system is very good and overall skill levels are high, not just among the top few percentile of university kids but across all strata of the education system. There is also good social mobility and plenty of opportunities for people who want to take them.

Infrastructure is among the best in the world with virtually everything being maintained in perfect condition.

All this comes at a price of course, but people have social and civic responsibility and populist positions based on envy and hate of those richer than themselves are typically turned down at the polls.
I agree that opportunities are there but could be more equal. While not being an expert on education I was looking at different statistics for a project related to another country. Switzerland was not that great for equality of academic performance. For example Estonia and Canada appear to do this much better.

Also Switzerland is spending too much money for the test results it gets. I never looked into reasons for that. I guess being an expensive place plays a role.

For example for the US, also very bad money/results ratio holder, it was explained as spending too much on students with disabilities, tablets, etc. Of course it is always a question of how to distribute money. You can't get everything. May be harsh but I would rather invest into the majority and top performers. I think that lifts a society up faster. While all members of the society contribute or damage it, those most able can do disproportionately more (well, will agree that sometimes they can do very bad things as well). More able and more educated ones come up with innovations usually.

Regardless of how controversial, PISA tests show us that it is possible to get majority much more educated than we are doing. OECD average for top grade receivers was 17%, while places like Singapur, Hong Kong do achieve close to 50%.

Having held exercises many times at ETH I also know personally that many graduates of so acclaimed gymnasiums come with very mediocre maths knowledge.
Reply With Quote
This user groans at minimimi for this post:
  #39  
Old 10.09.2021, 22:01
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zentralschweiz
Posts: 129
Groaned at 46 Times in 19 Posts
Thanked 246 Times in 79 Posts
wachtwoord has a reputation beyond reputewachtwoord has a reputation beyond reputewachtwoord has a reputation beyond reputewachtwoord has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Vote September 26th

@Minimimi: those type of comparisons you are referring to are quite subjective and usually extremely biased, even if not intentional by those making the comparison. I wouldn't put any value into that. On top of that if it only shows relative worth if (hypothetically) worldwide there are only 2 countries (slightly) better that isn't a big deal. It much more useful to compare to yourself in the past (the progression in time) and that's already hard enough to do with any level of objectivity.
Reply With Quote
The following 2 users would like to thank wachtwoord for this useful post:
  #40  
Old 10.09.2021, 22:18
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Zurich
Posts: 1,155
Groaned at 30 Times in 26 Posts
Thanked 533 Times in 353 Posts
minimimi has earned the respect of manyminimimi has earned the respect of manyminimimi has earned the respect of many
Re: Vote September 26th

Quote:
View Post
those type of comparisons you are referring to are quite subjective and usually extremely biased, even if not intentional by those making the comparison.
which ones, why?

no way I can find all the reports now, read tones of them.

but this is for Switzerland:

https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Equity-in-...witzerland.pdf

"In Switzerland, social background is more closely linked to success at school than it is in many other countries"

Whoever is interested can read the rest...
Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
22nd September 2013: Ticino and the Burka ban vote Sean Connery Swiss politics/news 738 07.07.2014 13:05
Vote in September for new epidemie laws omtatsat Daily life 128 21.08.2013 17:17
Anybody travelling from Zurich to Geneva/Lyone tomorrow - 26th September samofsydney Transportation/driving 0 25.09.2009 15:01
Anyone fany going for a Doggy outing on Saturday 26th September [ZH] Guest Pet corner 1 24.09.2009 12:12
Canton Zurich: Smoking Vote September 28 AbFab Swiss politics/news 246 07.10.2008 23:22


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0