View Poll Results: Why do you use Google? |
It was set up that way when I first got my device(s)
|    | 2 | 4.65% |
I didn’t realise I had a choice, it was just there.
|    | 6 | 13.95% |
I wanted to change but I couldn’t figure out how to change it
|    | 2 | 4.65% |
I don’t use Google
|    | 6 | 13.95% |
Other
|    | 27 | 62.79% |  | | | 
20.10.2020, 20:24
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Nyon
Posts: 4,246
Groaned at 206 Times in 150 Posts
Thanked 5,799 Times in 2,712 Posts
| | Google antitrust
Please be honest
| 
20.10.2020, 20:35
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Zürich
Posts: 937
Groaned at 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thanked 538 Times in 327 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust www.duckduckgo.com
at least until I really have to find something | The following 5 users would like to thank ChrisNeedsToKnow for this useful post: | | 
20.10.2020, 20:39
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: ZH
Posts: 1,213
Groaned at 14 Times in 14 Posts
Thanked 2,152 Times in 898 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
Do you mean as a search provider or android vs apple?
| This user would like to thank Ato for this useful post: | | 
20.10.2020, 20:50
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Nyon
Posts: 4,246
Groaned at 206 Times in 150 Posts
Thanked 5,799 Times in 2,712 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
As a search provider. That’s the essence of the complaint, Google abusing their dominant position in search engines. Goggle’s defense is that everyone has a choice.
Android vs iOS is yet to come, but likely in Europe first.
| 
20.10.2020, 21:43
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Lugano
Posts: 30,673
Groaned at 2,207 Times in 1,641 Posts
Thanked 36,900 Times in 17,469 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | | | | | | Likewise.
Google is, alas, better.
Tom
| The following 7 users would like to thank st2lemans for this useful post: | | 
20.10.2020, 21:46
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: May 2013 Location: Up above Nyon
Posts: 3,914
Groaned at 109 Times in 68 Posts
Thanked 5,208 Times in 2,028 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
Other :
I use google for general stuff.. Like "ramen in zurich'
If i want anything controversial I adjust accordingly.
| This user would like to thank John_H for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 06:52
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Nyon
Posts: 4,246
Groaned at 206 Times in 150 Posts
Thanked 5,799 Times in 2,712 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
PS, completely off-topic but if you put g! at the end of your search string ddg will return google’s results but you aren’t tracked by google.
| The following 6 users would like to thank bowlie for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 07:16
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Aargau
Posts: 8,675
Groaned at 122 Times in 89 Posts
Thanked 6,306 Times in 3,524 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
Because I hate using Bing, especially its there set by default in my browser and too lazy to change it.
Don’t you use famous answer on the EF ... LMGTFY?
| The following 2 users would like to thank jacek for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 07:18
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 11,882
Groaned at 301 Times in 257 Posts
Thanked 22,434 Times in 8,142 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
Well, you didn’t add the most obvious answer: Google is the market leader because their search works. It has 20years of usage data of me, so the algorithm delivers much better results than any other engine.
| The following 20 users would like to thank Treverus for this useful post: | 22 yards, 3Wishes, amogles, Ato, Axa, Blueangel, fatmanfilms, gipfelisturmer, HIAO, jacek, k_and_e, nejc, olygirl, Phil_MCR, porsch1909, roegner, st2lemans, terrifisch, ThomasSSS, Tom1234 | 
21.10.2020, 08:50
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Basel
Posts: 14,296
Groaned at 276 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 17,699 Times in 7,471 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Well, you didn’t add the most obvious answer: Google is the market leader because their search works. It has 20years of usage data of me, so the algorithm delivers much better results than any other engine. | | | | | Yup. I remember switching from AltaVista after their results became too poor and never looked back.
| The following 4 users would like to thank Phil_MCR for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 09:28
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Basel
Posts: 664
Groaned at 8 Times in 7 Posts
Thanked 514 Times in 271 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Well, you didn’t add the most obvious answer: Google is the market leader because their search works. It has 20years of usage data of me, so the algorithm delivers much better results than any other engine. | | | | | Exactly, the poll answers are a bit "biased".
So "Other" it is. | The following 8 users would like to thank gipfelisturmer for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 10:10
|  | modified, reprogrammed and doctored² | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: La Cote
Posts: 16,617
Groaned at 356 Times in 245 Posts
Thanked 19,133 Times in 9,982 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Exactly, the poll answers are a bit "biased".
So "Other" it is.  | | | | | Google delivers different data based on me being either logged in or out. That by itself is wrong, in my world.
| This user would like to thank MusicChick for this useful post: | | This user groans at MusicChick for this post: | | 
21.10.2020, 10:14
|  | All mod cons | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Basel-Land
Posts: 9,134
Groaned at 290 Times in 229 Posts
Thanked 19,481 Times in 7,676 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Google delivers different data based on me being either logged in or out. That by itself is wrong, in my world. | | | | | Sounds exactly right to me. If you let Google know who you are, you get results more closely aligned with what you want.
Presumably cookies are wrong, too, in your world?
| The following 3 users would like to thank 22 yards for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 10:25
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Aargau
Posts: 8,675
Groaned at 122 Times in 89 Posts
Thanked 6,306 Times in 3,524 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Well, you didn’t add the most obvious answer: Google is the market leader because their search works. It has 20years of usage data of me, so the algorithm delivers much better results than any other engine. | | | | | Yeah. Google finds everything. The rest is waste of time | This user would like to thank jacek for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 10:55
|  | A modal singularity | | Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Morgins, VS (and Alsace)
Posts: 9,030
Groaned at 365 Times in 236 Posts
Thanked 15,354 Times in 6,645 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust
I prefer DDG as a search engine, but google are still way ahead of the crowd for maps/navigation and translation, as far as I know, so I still use them for that.
I'm not really very much aware of whatever this anti-trust thing alluded to be ther thread title is all about, and frankly it's not something that would be veryt likely to sway me towards or away from their tools.
| 
21.10.2020, 10:57
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Switzerland
Posts: 21,835
Groaned at 391 Times in 302 Posts
Thanked 16,780 Times in 9,467 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | I prefer DDG as a search engine, but google are still way ahead of the crowd for maps/navigation and translation, as far as I know, so I still use them for that.
I'm not really very much aware of whatever this anti-trust thing alluded to be ther thread title is all about, and frankly it's not something that would be veryt likely to sway me towards or away from their tools. | | | | | Fyi https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54619148 | This user would like to thank Medea Fleecestealer for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 11:05
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 12,550
Groaned at 205 Times in 182 Posts
Thanked 20,434 Times in 8,432 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Presumably cookies are wrong, too, in your world? | | | | | Cookies are never wrong. Cranberry and chocolate chip are my favourites.
| The following 9 users would like to thank Belgianmum for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 12:25
|  | Forum Legend | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 11,882
Groaned at 301 Times in 257 Posts
Thanked 22,434 Times in 8,142 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Yeah. Google finds everything. The rest is waste of time  | | | | | Ive never said that. I said that the search works. Based on the profile they have of me do they manage to get me the relevant result. Basic example which I just tried: I know there is a Thai restaurant called "Bangkok" in Luxembourg. With google I search for "Thai restaurant Bangkok" and since google knows where I usually am will it automatically list first the relevant restaurant for me. Duckduckgo first lists the best Thai restaurants IN Bangkok followed by restaurants called Bangkok purely based on their page rank - how popular and good the page is. Apparently a Thai restaurant in the US state of Indiana as well as a chain of restaurants by the name across half of the US have better websites than the one in Luxembourg.
Could I make a search string that would find me the relevant information without googles profile? Yes. Is it worth my time? I dont think so.
I know the Internet well enough to find stuff that isnt listed with google. But for 99% of the time does Google do a brilliant job. And I am totally fine that they make money from advertisement and managed to bring a whole lot of old advertisement companies out of business. The only problems I have with them are:
1. If the targeting of the ads go too far. Im fine that some advertiser wants to find people based on my demographics. I would be less fine with it if say a health insurance would use it to "adapt" the pricing based on what google knows I spend elsewhere.
2. If Google uses their power badly. For example when they list results of their own market place to shop before the manufacturers website. They know exactly what I am looking for but want to guide me to a service they earn on instead...
In short: Peanuts compared to the ethic issues I have with Facebook.
| The following 5 users would like to thank Treverus for this useful post: | | 
21.10.2020, 12:32
| Forum Legend | | Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Nyon
Posts: 4,246
Groaned at 206 Times in 150 Posts
Thanked 5,799 Times in 2,712 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | Ive never said that. I said that the search works. Based on the profile they have of me do they manage to get me the relevant result. Basic example which I just tried: I know there is a Thai restaurant called "Bangkok" in Luxembourg. With google I search for "Thai restaurant Bangkok" and since google knows where I usually am will it automatically list first the relevant restaurant for me. Duckduckgo first lists the best Thai restaurants IN Bangkok followed by restaurants called Bangkok purely based on their page rank - how popular and good the page is. Apparently a Thai restaurant in the US state of Indiana as well as a chain of restaurants by the name across half of the US have better websites than the one in Luxembourg.
Could I make a search string that would find me the relevant information without googles profile? Yes. Is it worth my time? I dont think so.
I know the Internet well enough to find stuff that isnt listed with google. But for 99% of the time does Google do a brilliant job. And I am totally fine that they make money from advertisement and managed to bring a whole lot of old advertisement companies out of business. The only problems I have with them are:
1. If the targeting of the ads go too far. Im fine that some advertiser wants to find people based on my demographics. I would be less fine with it if say a health insurance would use it to "adapt" the pricing based on what google knows I spend elsewhere.
2. If Google uses their power badly. For example when they list results of their own market place to shop before the manufacturers website. They know exactly what I am looking for but want to guide me to a service they earn on instead...
In short: Peanuts compared to the ethic issues I have with Facebook. | | | | | I wonder what your results would be if Google owned a Thai restaurant in Luxembourg called something other than Bangkok? Or if said restaurant paid google to be placed first ...
| 
21.10.2020, 13:59
| Forum Veteran | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Zurich
Posts: 855
Groaned at 130 Times in 67 Posts
Thanked 924 Times in 441 Posts
| | Re: Google antitrust | Quote: | |  | | | I wonder what your results would be if Google owned a Thai restaurant in Luxembourg called something other than Bangkok? Or if said restaurant paid google to be placed first ... | | | | | Google does not place a search result higher up because it is paid by a customer. The search results are placed according to various criteria but payment is not one of them.
Google, however can show a paid ad together with the search results.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | Thread Tools | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:17. | |